Whittington v. Paragon Casino Resort

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Whittington v. Paragon Casino Resort

867 So. 2d 174, 3 La.App. 3 Cir. 1286, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 461

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 3, 2004

DocketNo. WCA 03-1286

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 867 So. 2d 174 (Whittington v. Paragon Casino Resort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whittington v. Paragon Casino Resort, 867 So. 2d 174, 3 La.App. 3 Cir. 1286, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 461 (La. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

pEZELL, Judge.

This case involves the issue of whether the Office of Workers’ Compensation has subject matter jurisdiction to hear a claim filed by an employee of the Tunica Biloxi Indians of Louisiana d/b/a Paragon Casino. Finding that this specific issue has been recently addressed by this court, we affirm.

DISCUSSION

Priscilla Whittington was hired by Paragon Casino on November 28, 1995, as a soft count handler. She claims that, as a result of her employment, she suffered progressive carpal tunnel injury to both hands and wrists which subsequently caused pain and injury to her neck and back. She filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits on December 12, 2002.

Her claim was met with an exception of subject matter jurisdiction filed by Paragon Casino. A hearing on the exception was held on March 24, 2003. The workers’ compensation judge agreed with Paragon Casino that the Office of Workers’ Compensation does not have jurisdiction to litigate an action against the Tribe over activities that occurred on tribal lands. A judgment granting Paragon Casino’s exception of lack of subject matter jurisdiction was signed on June 18, 2003. Whit-tington appealed the judgment.

This very issue involving the same defendant was recently decided by a different panel of this court in Ortego v. Tunica Biloxi Indians of La. d/b/a Paragon Casino, 03-1001 (La.App. 3 Cir. 02/04/04), 865 So.2d 985. The panel in Ortego throughly reviewed the history, law, and jurisprudence surrounding jurisdiction of tribal courts and determined that the Tribe had not waived its sovereign immunity but had retained its civil jurisdiction over workers’ compensation claims brought as a result of tribal activities. We agree with the opinion and affirm the judgment of the | P,Office of Workers’ Compensation. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Priscilla Whittington.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

pEZELL, Judge.

This case involves the issue of whether the Office of Workers’ Compensation has subject matter jurisdiction to hear a claim filed by an employee of the Tunica Biloxi Indians of Louisiana d/b/a Paragon Casino. Finding that this specific issue has been recently addressed by this court, we affirm.

DISCUSSION

Priscilla Whittington was hired by Paragon Casino on November 28, 1995, as a soft count handler. She claims that, as a result of her employment, she suffered progressive carpal tunnel injury to both hands and wrists which subsequently caused pain and injury to her neck and back. She filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits on December 12, 2002.

Her claim was met with an exception of subject matter jurisdiction filed by Paragon Casino. A hearing on the exception was held on March 24, 2003. The workers’ compensation judge agreed with Paragon Casino that the Office of Workers’ Compensation does not have jurisdiction to litigate an action against the Tribe over activities that occurred on tribal lands. A judgment granting Paragon Casino’s exception of lack of subject matter jurisdiction was signed on June 18, 2003. Whit-tington appealed the judgment.

This very issue involving the same defendant was recently decided by a different panel of this court in Ortego v. Tunica Biloxi Indians of La. d/b/a Paragon Casino, 03-1001 (La.App. 3 Cir. 02/04/04), 865 So.2d 985. The panel in Ortego throughly reviewed the history, law, and jurisprudence surrounding jurisdiction of tribal courts and determined that the Tribe had not waived its sovereign immunity but had retained its civil jurisdiction over workers’ compensation claims brought as a result of tribal activities. We agree with the opinion and affirm the judgment of the | P,Office of Workers’ Compensation. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Priscilla Whittington.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 So. 2d 174, 3 La.App. 3 Cir. 1286, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whittington-v-paragon-casino-resort-lactapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack