Whittimore v. Whittimore
7 Paige Ch. 38, 1837 N.Y. LEXIS 306, 1837 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 100
Opinion
refused to allow a provision for such compensation to be inserted in the decree; saying, that the court had no jurisdiction or power to authorize the taxation in such a case of any greater amount for counsel fees than the allowance fixed by the legislature in the fee bill, and that the taxing officer could not legally be directed to allow any greater amount on taxation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whittimore v. Whittimore, 7 Paige Ch. 38, 1837 N.Y. LEXIS 306, 1837 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 100 (N.Y. 1837).
7 Paige Ch. 38 (Whittimore v. Whittimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dorsheimer v. Rorback
24 N.J. Eq. 33 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1873)
Lillie v. Sherman
39 How. Pr. 287 (New York Supreme Court, 1870)
Nicholson v. . Leavitt
6 N.Y. 510 (New York Court of Appeals, 1852)