Whitten v. State

802 So. 2d 475, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18023, 2001 WL 1637003
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 21, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-5384
StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 475 (Whitten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitten v. State, 802 So. 2d 475, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18023, 2001 WL 1637003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

SCHEB, JOHN M„ Senior Judge.

We affirm Damion Whitten’s judgment and sentences in these consolidated cases without prejudice to any right Whitten may have to file a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Pertaining to circuit court case numbers 99-3865F and 00-659F, we note that a defendant may not challenge the voluntariness of a guilty or nolo contendere plea on direct appeal unless the issue • has been preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea filed in the trial court. See State v. Thompson, 735 So.2d 482 (Fla.1999).

Affirmed.

STRINGER, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thompson
735 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 475, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18023, 2001 WL 1637003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitten-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.