Whittemore v. Russell

5 A. 72, 78 Me. 337, 1886 Me. LEXIS 64
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJune 29, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 5 A. 72 (Whittemore v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whittemore v. Russell, 5 A. 72, 78 Me. 337, 1886 Me. LEXIS 64 (Me. 1886).

Opinion

Hasicell, J.

Causes in equity come before the law court by two methods of procedure. E. S., c. 77, § § 20, 23 and 25.

I. After decree, entered by the presiding justice at nisi prius, upon appeal, or bill of exceptions.

[338]*338II. Upon report, when the presiding justice is of opinion and so certifies in the record, that any question of law is involved of sufficient importance, or doubt, to justify the same, and the parties agree thereto..

Of this cause, the law court takes no jurisdiction from the record presented, and has no power to hear and determine the same.

Dismissed from the law docket.

Peters, C. J., Walton, Yirgin, Emery and Foster, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A. 72, 78 Me. 337, 1886 Me. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whittemore-v-russell-me-1886.