Whittemore v. Crawford

D.C. Circuit

Whittemore v. Crawford

266 F. 1024, 49 App. D.C. 284, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2022

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 1, 1919

DocketNo. 3254

StatusPublished

This text of 266 F. 1024 (Whittemore v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whittemore v. Crawford, 266 F. 1024, 49 App. D.C. 284, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2022 (D.C. Cir. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court of the District for the plaintiff, appellee here, under law rule 19 of that court, in a landlord and tenant proceeding instituted in the municipal court.

Since appellant relies solely upon the Saulsbury Resolution (40 Stat. 593), this ease is ruled by our decision in Willson v. McDonnell, 49 App. D. C. 280, 265 Fed. 432. The judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court of the District for the plaintiff, appellee here, under law rule 19 of that court, in a landlord and tenant proceeding instituted in the municipal court.

Since appellant relies solely upon the Saulsbury Resolution (40 Stat. 593), this ease is ruled by our decision in Willson v. McDonnell, 49 App. D. C. 280, 265 Fed. 432. The judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 F. 1024, 49 App. D.C. 284, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whittemore-v-crawford-cadc-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack