Whittemore v. Boston & Maine Railroad
This text of 90 A. 601 (Whittemore v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Whittemore v. Railroad, ante, 61, 62, the court said in reference to the former decision, that if it “involved the determination of a federal question, the defendants no doubt can preserve their rights and have the question reviewed in the federal court; but questions once decided in this court are not reexamined *594 in the same case upon a subsequent transfer. Kidd v. Trust Co., 75 N. H. 154, 158.” No additional reasons are now presented for a reconsideration of the federal question suggested, or for a modification of the opinion given on the first transfer, as reported in 76 N. H. 388. Nor is there occasion for the court in the exercise of its discretion (Hedding v. Gallagher, 72 N. H. 377, 379) to again consider the federal question which is again raised by the defendant upon the same state of facts.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A. 601, 77 N.H. 593, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whittemore-v-boston-maine-railroad-nh-1914.