Whitted v. Thornburg

941 F.2d 1208, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23878, 1991 WL 165204
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 29, 1991
Docket91-7083
StatusUnpublished

This text of 941 F.2d 1208 (Whitted v. Thornburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitted v. Thornburg, 941 F.2d 1208, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23878, 1991 WL 165204 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

941 F.2d 1208

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
EARL WHITTED, JR., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
LACY H. THORNBURG, Attorney General of North Carolina;
DONALD M. JACOBS, District Attorney, Eighth Judicial
District; JAMES M. SASSER, High Sheriff; DAVID B.
BRANTLEY, Clerk of Superior Court, Wayne County,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 91-7083.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 26, 1991
Decided: August 29, 1991

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

D. Lynn Whitted, Goldsboro, North Carolina; Roland C. Braswell, Goldsboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Earl Whitted, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Whitted v. Thornburg, CA-90-608-HC-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mundy (Antoine Marvin)
941 F.2d 1208 (Fourth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
941 F.2d 1208, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23878, 1991 WL 165204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitted-v-thornburg-ca4-1991.