Whitted v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Whitted v. City of New York

91 A.D.2d 504, 456 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19307

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 A.D.2d 504 (Whitted v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitted v. City of New York, 91 A.D.2d 504, 456 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinions

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Di Fede, J.), dated May 5,1981, is modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Joyce Whitted against defendant City of New York, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only awarded to said plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $75,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Di Fede, J.), dated May 5,1981, is modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Joyce Whitted against defendant City of New York, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only awarded to said plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $75,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro and Silverman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.2d 504, 456 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitted-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack