Whittaker v. Ellison
589 So. 2d 469, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11998, 1991 WL 253830
This text of 589 So. 2d 469 (Whittaker v. Ellison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whittaker v. Ellison, 589 So. 2d 469, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11998, 1991 WL 253830 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
The record more than amply supports appellant’s argument relating to excusable neglect. Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to deny appellant’s Motion to Set Aside the Default. See B. C. Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado, 405 So.2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
BC Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado
405 So. 2d 1345 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
589 So. 2d 469, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11998, 1991 WL 253830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whittaker-v-ellison-fladistctapp-1991.