Whittaker v. Boston & Maine Railroad
This text of 73 Mass. 98 (Whittaker v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The ruling of the court was correct, that if Water [100]*100Street, at the time of the injury to the plaintiff, was an open and travelled street in Lawrence, though not so laid out and established that the city would be responsible for damages occasioned by defects therein, yet it would be a travelled <vay, within the meaning of the Si. of 1849, c. 222, § 2, and the defendants would be .bound to maintain a sign post at their crossing, and to adopt the precautions prescribed by law at crossings over highways and town ways, as directed by the Rev. Sts. c. 39. The case was one to which such instructions were properly adapted, and the exceptions taken thereto must be overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Mass. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whittaker-v-boston-maine-railroad-mass-1856.