Whitt v. Reed

32 S.W.2d 324, 235 Ky. 758, 1930 Ky. LEXIS 454
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedOctober 28, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 32 S.W.2d 324 (Whitt v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitt v. Reed, 32 S.W.2d 324, 235 Ky. 758, 1930 Ky. LEXIS 454 (Ky. 1930).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Dismissing appeal.

At the regular election held in the month of November, 1929, C. S. Reed and Malcolm Whitt were rival candidates for the office of member of the board of education in educational division No. 1 of Magoffin county. Reed received more votes than Whitt and was awarded the certificate. Whitt contested the election and on the final hearing Reed was declared elected. Whitt appeals.

At the outset we are confronted by a motion to dismiss the appeal. The statute reads:

“Either party may appeal from the judgment of the circuit court to the court of appeals by giving bond to the clerk of the circuit court, with good surety, conditioned for the payment of all costs and damages the other party may sustain by reason of the appeal and by filing the record in the clerk’s office of the court of appeals, within thirty days after the final judgment in the circuit court.” Section 1596a-12, Ky. Stats.

Under this statute the execution of the required bond and the filing of the record in this court within 30 days *759 after final judgment in the circuit court are necessary in order to perfect the appeal. The record before us does not disclose that the required bond was executed. Moreover, final judgment was rendered on April 30, 1930, and the record was not filed in this court until June 24, 1930, wbicb was long after the time fixed by the statute. As the appeal was not perfected in the manner or within the time required by the statute, the motion to dismiss will have to be sustained. Bingham v. Anderson, 190 Ky, 680, 251 S. W. 973; Philips v. Robinson, 225 Ky. 682, 9 S. W. (2d) 995.

Wherefore the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. Demunbrun
189 S.W.2d 682 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1945)
Lewis v. Sizemore
118 S.W.2d 133 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1938)
Kinner v. Zachem
117 S.W.2d 943 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1938)
Campbell v. Combs
116 S.W.2d 955 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1938)
Barker v. Blankenship
111 S.W.2d 592 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.W.2d 324, 235 Ky. 758, 1930 Ky. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitt-v-reed-kyctapphigh-1930.