Whitt v. Lopez
This text of Whitt v. Lopez (Whitt v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 22, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D18-718 Lower Tribunal No. 17-5068 ________________
Jesse Tyler Whitt, Appellant,
vs.
Crystal Lopez, Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del Rey, Judge.
Kimberly H. Schultz, for appellant.
Kenneth M. Kaplan, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the trial court’s order without
prejudice to appellant’s right to accept the trial court’s invitation to schedule an
evidentiary hearing on the question of the validity of the hair follicle drug test.1
1 As the trial court stated to appellant’s counsel during the February 14, 2018 hearing, “[i]f you want to go ahead and reset it for a later time for an evidentiary hearing you are welcome to. But in the interim the child is not going to be in danger. I warned you both specifically. And I am not going to have this child on drugs—he on drugs with the child around.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Whitt v. Lopez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitt-v-lopez-fladistctapp-2018.