Whitson v. Haniel-Clark & Son
This text of 118 S.E. 578 (Whitson v. Haniel-Clark & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“ The mere fact that there are eoniliets in the testimony-does not render the direction of a verdict in favor of a party erroneous, when it appears that the conflicts are immaterial, and that, giving to the opposite party the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence as a whole and of all legitimate inferences therefrom, the verdict against him is demanded. Sanders Mfg. Co. v. Dollar Savings Bank, 110 Ga. 559.” Skinner v. Braswell, 126 Ga. 761 (2) (55 S. E. 914). Under the principle announced above the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 S.E. 578, 30 Ga. App. 625, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitson-v-haniel-clark-son-gactapp-1923.