Whitson v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Whitson v. Bell

1935 OK 227, 43 P.2d 73, 171 Okla. 389, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 219

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 5, 1935

DocketNo. 24832.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1935 OK 227 (Whitson v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitson v. Bell, 1935 OK 227, 43 P.2d 73, 171 Okla. 389, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 219 (Okla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff below, plaintiff in-error herein, to obtain an injunction against the enforcement of a certain ordinance of the city of Pauls Valley relative to the running of a pool hall.

Brief was filed herein October 24, 1934, and upon an examination of the authorities cited therein it appears that not a single ease sustains remotely the proposition urged by the plaintiff in error, and of the three authorities cited none of them deal with the proposition urged in the appeal at all.

This court has held that where, from an examination of the proceedings, the petition in error, and the brief filed, it appears that the appeal is manifestly without merit, the appeal will be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff below, plaintiff in-error herein, to obtain an injunction against the enforcement of a certain ordinance of the city of Pauls Valley relative to the running of a pool hall.

Brief was filed herein October 24, 1934, and upon an examination of the authorities cited therein it appears that not a single ease sustains remotely the proposition urged by the plaintiff in error, and of the three authorities cited none of them deal with the proposition urged in the appeal at all.

This court has held that where, from an examination of the proceedings, the petition in error, and the brief filed, it appears that the appeal is manifestly without merit, the appeal will be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK 227, 43 P.2d 73, 171 Okla. 389, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitson-v-bell-okla-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack