Whitney v. Wells

28 How. Pr. 150
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 How. Pr. 150 (Whitney v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitney v. Wells, 28 How. Pr. 150 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1864).

Opinion

This action originated in a justice’s court, where the plaintiff recovered a verdict for $50 damages. The defendant appealed to the Cortland county court, where the plaintiff again recovered a verdict for the same amount of damages. The defendant made a case containing his exceptions taken on the trial in the county court, which were settled and made a part of the judgment roll in that court. He [151]*151then appealed from the judgment of that court to this court, without first moving for a new trial in the former court. His counsel made the point in. this court that the verdict of the jury in the county court was against the evidence. But upon this point the court said : “ This court cannot set aside the verdict and grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is against the evidence. The defendant should have moved for a new trial on that ground in the county court, before appealing to this court.”

W. H. Warren, for plaintiff. Stephen Kellogg, for defendant.

This court, however, reversed the judgment of the county court, and granted a new trial in that court for an error in the charge of the county judge to the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Broughton v. Mitchell
19 Abb. Pr. 163 (New York Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 How. Pr. 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-v-wells-nysupct-1864.