Home/New York Supreme Court/Whitney v. Wardell

Whitney v. Wardell

28 N.Y.S. 1118, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 885
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 8, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 28 N.Y.S. 1118 (Whitney v. Wardell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitney v. Wardell, 28 N.Y.S. 1118, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 885 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

HERRICK, J.

I think the judgment should be affirmed. There is nothing in the case to show that Whitney advanced any money, gave credit, or accepted the note upon which the action is brought, in reliance upon the statement that Wardell was a member of the firm of W. J. Caywood & Co., or was in any way misled by any “holding out” by Wardell that he was a member of such firm. Lawrence v. Brown, 5 N. Y. 394; Poillon v. Secor, 61 N. Y. 456; Pringle v. Leverich, 48 N. Y. Super. Ct. 90; Du Bois v. Lamson, 18 Wkly. Dig. 490; Vibbard v. Roderick, 51 Barb. 616; Irvin v. Conklin, 36 Barb. 64. Judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poillon v. . Secor
61 N.Y. 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Lawrence v. . Brown
5 N.Y. 394 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)
Irvin v. Conklin
36 Barb. 64 (New York Supreme Court, 1861)
Vibbard v. Roderick
51 Barb. 616 (New York Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 N.Y.S. 1118, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-v-wardell-nysupct-1894.