Whitney v. Turner

2 Ill. 253
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1836
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Ill. 253 (Whitney v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitney v. Turner, 2 Ill. 253 (Ill. 1836).

Opinion

Lockwood, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of trespass de bonis asportatis brought by Turner against Whitney and the other defendants in the Circuit Court of Adams county. After the testimony had been adduced, Whitney, one of the defendants who had pleaded not guilty, applied to the Court to instruct the jury, that it was necessary that the trespass should be proved to have been committed by George Taylor and said Whitney, personally, and not by command, before the jury could find a verdict against them ; but the Court refused to give such instruction, and stated it to be the opinion of the Court, that it was improper so to do. Was the refusal to give this instruction erroneous? The doctrine in relation to trespass is well settled, that there are no accessaries ; all are principals who are in anywise concerned in the trespass. The person who commands or approves, is. equally guilty with the one who performs the act. The refusal of the Court, therefore, to give the instruction, was correct.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gunder v. Tibbits
55 N.E. 762 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Ill. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-v-turner-ill-1836.