Whitney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Whitney v. State

936 So. 2d 715, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13589, 2006 WL 2345870

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Whitney v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3642 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 2006·No. No. 1D06-3087·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of July 5, 2006, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal filed on June 6, 2006, appealing the order denying the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence rendered on March 23, 2006, is untimely. Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order and the untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). This appeal is hereby dismissed.

DISMISSED.

DAVIS, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of July 5, 2006, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal filed on June 6, 2006, appealing the order denying the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence rendered on March 23, 2006, is untimely. Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order and the untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). This appeal is hereby dismissed.

DISMISSED.

DAVIS, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Whitney v. State, 936 So. 2d 715, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13589, 2006 WL 2345870 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

936 So. 2d 715 (Whitney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.