Whitney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Whitney v. State

845 So. 2d 1011, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7551, 2003 WL 21203324

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 2003

DocketNo. 5D01-3853

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 845 So. 2d 1011 (Whitney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitney v. State, 845 So. 2d 1011, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7551, 2003 WL 21203324 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Siep Whitney appeals a post-judgment order denying credit for time served in jail.

Wfiiile Whitney was in jail in Seminole County, Orange County issued a warrant for his arrest. The record shows that the Orange County Sheriffs Office later returned the warrant unserved to the Criminal Division of the Circuit Court at the latter’s request. The trial court correctly denied the credit because the warrant was never executed. See Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504 (Fla.2003) (holding that “absent [1012]*1012the execution of an arrest warrant, a defendant who is in jail in a specific county-pursuant to an arrest on one or more charges need not be given credit for time served in that county on charges in another county when the second county has only lodged a detainer against the defendant.”)

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Siep Whitney appeals a post-judgment order denying credit for time served in jail.

Wfiiile Whitney was in jail in Seminole County, Orange County issued a warrant for his arrest. The record shows that the Orange County Sheriffs Office later returned the warrant unserved to the Criminal Division of the Circuit Court at the latter’s request. The trial court correctly denied the credit because the warrant was never executed. See Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504 (Fla.2003) (holding that “absent [1012]*1012the execution of an arrest warrant, a defendant who is in jail in a specific county-pursuant to an arrest on one or more charges need not be given credit for time served in that county on charges in another county when the second county has only lodged a detainer against the defendant.”)

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

845 So. 2d 1011, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7551, 2003 WL 21203324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack