Whitney v. Purrington

California Supreme Court

Whitney v. Purrington

59 Cal. 36

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1881

DocketNo. 7,504

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 Cal. 36 (Whitney v. Purrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitney v. Purrington, 59 Cal. 36 (Cal. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court:

The complaint charges that the parties entered into a partnership to sell hay, grain, etc. That the business was con-tinned until April, 1879, when an accounting of the whole business was had and a settlement made, by which there “became due” (was found to be due) from defendant to plaintiff a certain sum. The evidence tended to prove a purchase of the plaintiff’s interest in the goods and assets of the firm by defendant. The Court below nonsuited plaintiff, in which we can not say there was error. •

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court:

The complaint charges that the parties entered into a partnership to sell hay, grain, etc. That the business was con-tinned until April, 1879, when an accounting of the whole business was had and a settlement made, by which there “became due” (was found to be due) from defendant to plaintiff a certain sum. The evidence tended to prove a purchase of the plaintiff’s interest in the goods and assets of the firm by defendant. The Court below nonsuited plaintiff, in which we can not say there was error. •

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cal. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-v-purrington-cal-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack