Whitney v. McConnell
30 Mich. 421, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 210
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Whitney v. McConnell. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Mich. 12 →
Opinion
We are of opinion that the authority of Mr. Clay to receive for the plaintiffs payment of the judgment in this case was sufficiently shown. And, also, that as he has given the defendants a receipt in full, and no fraud is shown or alleged, the circuit court was justified in ordering perpetual stay, and the plaintiffs must be left to their remedy against the attorney to whose care they entrusted the suit. The order will stand affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitney v. McConnell, 30 Mich. 421, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 210 (Mich. 1874).
30 Mich. 421 (Whitney v. McConnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.