Whitney v. Hill

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Whitney v. Hill

61 So. 3d 482, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7252, 2011 WL 1899518

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Whitney v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1932 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 2011·No. No. 5D10-420·Published

Opinion

PALMER, J.

In this legal malpractice action, Attorney Max Whitney appeals the amended final judgment entered by the trial court in favor of appellee, Dr. Michael Hill. Whitney’s claims of error are without merit and, therefore, we affirm the final judgment. However, we remand for correction of a mathematical error in the award of attorney’s fees in the final judgment. The award amount should be $17,875 rather than $18,875.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of mathematical error.

GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PALMER, J.

In this legal malpractice action, Attorney Max Whitney appeals the amended final judgment entered by the trial court in favor of appellee, Dr. Michael Hill. Whitney’s claims of error are without merit and, therefore, we affirm the final judgment. However, we remand for correction of a mathematical error in the award of attorney’s fees in the final judgment. The award amount should be $17,875 rather than $18,875.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of mathematical error.

GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Whitney v. Hill, 61 So. 3d 482, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7252, 2011 WL 1899518 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

61 So. 3d 482 (Whitney v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.