Whitney v. Haven

13 Mass. 172
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 13 Mass. 172 (Whitney v. Haven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitney v. Haven, 13 Mass. 172 (Mass. 1816).

Opinion

Curia.

The objection, that there was a delay of sailing, amounting to a deviation, was left to the jury to determine, whether the delay was caused by imminent danger of capture. We think the cause for delay was a justifiable one ; and the jury have found that it existed. The declaration of the underwriter, that unless the vessel should sail by a certain day he would not be bound, should have made a part of the written contract, if he intended to avail himself of it. Parol evidence is not sufficient to give it effect. As to the objection that the policy did not attach, because the property insured was not on board the vessel at its date, we think it of no weight.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kimball v. Ætna Insurance
91 Mass. 540 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1865)
Jennings v. Chenango Mutual Insurance
2 Denio 75 (New York Supreme Court, 1846)
Alston v. Mechanics' Mutual Insurance
4 Hill & Den. 329 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)
Bryant v. Ocean Insurance
39 Mass. 200 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1839)
Wiggin v. Boardman
14 Mass. 12 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1817)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Mass. 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-v-haven-mass-1816.