Whitney v. Haven
1 Super. Ct. Jud. 334
Opinion
But
accepted them, contrary to the Opinion of Cushing, Justice.
Afterwards, the Plaintiff was admitted to give Evidence that the pretended Warrant whereby he was arrested was different from that set forth in the Defendant’s Justification. The Proof was not sufficient.
Judgment for Defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitney v. Haven, 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 334 (Mass. 1772).
1 Super. Ct. Jud. 334 (Whitney v. Haven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.