Whitney v. Cook

99 U.S. 607, 25 L. Ed. 446, 1878 U.S. LEXIS 1581
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 21, 1879·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a motion to affirm only. Our amended Rule 6 allows a motion to affirm to be united with a motion to dismiss. This implies that there shall appear on the record at least some color of right to a dismissal. That is not pretended in this case. We are therefore compelled to deny the motion. Our experience teaches that the only way to discourage frivolous appeals and writs of error is by the use of our power to award damages, and we think this a proper case in which to say that hereafter more attention will be given to that subject, and the rule enforced both according to its letter and spirit. Parties should not be subjected to the delay of proceedings for review in this court without reasonable cause, and our power to make compensation to some extent for the loss occasioned by an unwarranted delay ought not to be overlooked.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitney v. Cook, 99 U.S. 607, 25 L. Ed. 446, 1878 U.S. LEXIS 1581 (1879).

99 U.S. 607 (Whitney v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tom Moulton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
733 F.2d 734 (Tenth Circuit, 1984)
Seyler v. Seyler
678 F.2d 29 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
May Department Stores Co. v. Reynolds
140 F.2d 799 (Eighth Circuit, 1944)
Huber v. Shedoudy
181 P. 63 (California Supreme Court, 1919)
Sweeney v. Coulter
58 S.W. 784 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1900)
Chanute City v. Trader
132 U.S. 210 (Supreme Court, 1889)
The Alaska
130 U.S. 201 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Dzialynski v. Bank of Jacksonville
23 Fla. 44 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1887)
Davies v. Corbin
113 U.S. 687 (Supreme Court, 1885)
School District v. Hall
106 U.S. 428 (Supreme Court, 1882)
Hinckley v. Morton
103 U.S. 764 (Supreme Court, 1881)
Cook v. Whitney
6 F. Cas. 415 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Mississippi, 1877)