Whitney v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Florida

Whitney v. Cochran

139 So. 2d 406, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 3044

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 1962

DocketNo. 31516

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 2d 406 (Whitney v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitney v. Cochran, 139 So. 2d 406, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 3044 (Fla. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Dennis Manaford Whitney and the respondent’s Return thereto as required by the writ which we have heretofore issued. In order to afford the petitioner and the respondent an opportunity to present relevant facts in the premises the Honorable Lamar Warren, Circuit Judge, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit is hereby appointed a commissioner of this Court to receive such evidence as might be offered to support the petition and the return. The commissioner shall cause the testimony to be duly transcribed and reported to this Court, together with his findings and recommendations.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Dennis Manaford Whitney and the respondent’s Return thereto as required by the writ which we have heretofore issued. In order to afford the petitioner and the respondent an opportunity to present relevant facts in the premises the Honorable Lamar Warren, Circuit Judge, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit is hereby appointed a commissioner of this Court to receive such evidence as might be offered to support the petition and the return. The commissioner shall cause the testimony to be duly transcribed and reported to this Court, together with his findings and recommendations.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 2d 406, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 3044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-v-cochran-fla-1962.