Whitney Museum of American Art v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
537 N.E.2d 621, 73 N.Y.2d 938, 540 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 292
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (139 AD2d 444). Certified question answered in the affirmative.
*941 Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, KLaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitney Museum of American Art v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 537 N.E.2d 621, 73 N.Y.2d 938, 540 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 292 (N.Y. 1989).
537 N.E.2d 621 (Whitney Museum of American Art v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kobrick v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
105 A.D.3d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Notre Dame Leasing Ltd. Partnership v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal
22 A.D.3d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Henschke v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
174 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)