Whitney Benefits, Inc. And Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States
This text of 57 F.3d 1083 (Whitney Benefits, Inc. And Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
57 F.3d 1083
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
WHITNEY BENEFITS, INC. and Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-5129.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 11, 1995.
Fed.Cl.
REMANDED.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Motion to Remand for Entry of a Stipulated Judgment,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is remanded to the Court of Federal Claims with instructions, pursuant to U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 115 S. Ct. 386, 393 (1994), that it consider the request of the parties (a) to vacate certain previous judgments of that court and (b) to enter a stipulated judgment in accordance with the final settlement agreement of the parties.
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the mandate issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F.3d 1083, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25738, 1995 WL 305608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-benefits-inc-and-peter-kiewit-sons-co-v-un-cafc-1995.