Whitney Bank v. Henry Rayford
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT WHITNEY BANK NO. 2021 CW 1382
VERSUS
HENRY RAYFORD DECEMBER 30, 2021
In Re: Henry Rayford, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No.
108044.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. This writ application fails to comply with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4- 5( C)( 8) and ( 9). Relator, Henry Rayford, failed to include a copy of the pleadings upon which the ruling was founded and a copy of the
no opposition
opposition and attachments or statement advising was filed.
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9.
In the event relator seeks to file a new application with
this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, the
missing items noted above, and must comply with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 12. 2. Any new application must be filed on or before January 31, 2022, and must contain a
copy of this ruling.
VGW
AHP
CHH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CL R OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitney Bank v. Henry Rayford (Whitney Bank v. Henry Rayford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.