Whitmore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Whitmore v. State

568 So. 2d 1009, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8355, 1990 WL 164987

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 1990

DocketNo. 90-2214

StatusPublished

This text of 568 So. 2d 1009 (Whitmore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitmore v. State, 568 So. 2d 1009, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8355, 1990 WL 164987 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief from a conviction for second degree murder. The appellant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to investigate and counsel appellant on his one viable defense and failing to advise him properly on the sentencing guidelines. Had counsel adequately informed him on these issues, appellant claims, he would have never agreed to plead guilty and accept the 40-year sentence rendered. We cannot conclude that the grounds alleged are legally insufficient on their face. See Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Therefore, we remand this cause for attachment of portions of the record showing appellant is not entitled to relief or for an evidentiary hearing on the issue.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief from a conviction for second degree murder. The appellant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to investigate and counsel appellant on his one viable defense and failing to advise him properly on the sentencing guidelines. Had counsel adequately informed him on these issues, appellant claims, he would have never agreed to plead guilty and accept the 40-year sentence rendered. We cannot conclude that the grounds alleged are legally insufficient on their face. See Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Therefore, we remand this cause for attachment of portions of the record showing appellant is not entitled to relief or for an evidentiary hearing on the issue.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 So. 2d 1009, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8355, 1990 WL 164987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitmore-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack