Whitmore v. Ormsbee
329 U.S. 668, 67 S. Ct. 63
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1946
DocketNo. 210; No. 211; No. 212
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 329 U.S. 668 (Whitmore v. Ormsbee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whitmore v. Ormsbee, 329 U.S. 668, 67 S. Ct. 63 (1946).
Opinion
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed. (1) Hills-borough v. Cromwell, 326 U. S. 620, 623; Matthews v. Rodgers, 284 U. S. 521, 525; (2) Union Brokerage Co. v. Jensen, 322 U. S. 202.
Reported below: 64 F. Supp. 911.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Taxes
379 P.2d 336 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1963)
Re Taxes, Armstrong Perry
379 P.2d 336 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1963)
J. Elroy McCaw and John D. Keating v. Earl W. Fase, the Tax Commissioner of the Territory of Hawaii
216 F.2d 700 (Ninth Circuit, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
329 U.S. 668, 67 S. Ct. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitmore-v-ormsbee-scotus-1946.