Whitmore v. New York Interurban Water Co.
This text of 141 N.Y.S. 1151 (Whitmore v. New York Interurban Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Without passing upon the merits of the controversy, in view of the defendant’s statement that it does not intend to cut off the water for failure to pay the higher rates until its right to do so is determined, it seems best to continue the temporary injunction until the trial of the action.' Reargument denied 141 N. Y. Supp. 1151.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 N.Y.S. 1151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitmore-v-new-york-interurban-water-co-nyappdiv-1913.