Whitmore v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co.
This text of 156 A.D. 892 (Whitmore v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Without passing upon the merits of the controversy, in view of the defendant’s statement that it does not intend to cut off the water for failure to pay the higher rates until its right to do so is determined, it seems best to continue the temporary injunction until the trial of the action. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 A.D. 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitmore-v-new-york-inter-urban-water-co-nyappdiv-1913.