Whitmore v. Department of Highways
This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 304 (Whitmore v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At 2:45 p.m. on March 6, 1980, claimant was operating his 1972 Chevrolet van on 5th Street Hill in Huntington, West Virginia, a road which is owned and maintained by the respondent. According [305]*305to the claimant’s testimony, there was a pothole on the right-hand side of his lane of travel. The van struck the hole, went out of control, and overturned. Introduced into evidence was an estimate from Larry Lite of Galigher Ford, Inc., which indicated that the value of the van on the day of the accident was $1,600.00. Claimant sold the salvage for $300.00, leaving a net loss of $1,300.00.
The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of motorists travelling upon its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). Furthermore, in the instant case, claimant stated that he was familiar with not only the road in question, but the pothole itself: “I knew it was there because I’d hit it before.” To operate a motor vehicle in the face of visible hazards, such as defects in the road, of which a driver is aware, is to assume a known risk. This bars recovery. Swartzmiller v. Dept. of Highways, 10 Ct.Cl. 29 (1973). Accordingly, this claim must be denied.
Claim disallowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Ct. Cl. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitmore-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1980.