Whitmore v. Ard

512 F. App'x 375
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 2013
DocketNo. 12-7999
StatusPublished

This text of 512 F. App'x 375 (Whitmore v. Ard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitmore v. Ard, 512 F. App'x 375 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Whitmore appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Whitmore v. Ard, No. 6:12-cv-01049-JMC (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 F. App'x 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitmore-v-ard-ca4-2013.