Whitmore v. Ard

Fourth Circuit

Whitmore v. Ard

512 F. App'x 375

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2013·No. No. 12-7999·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Whitmore appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Whitmore v. Ard, No. 6:12-cv-01049-JMC (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Whitmore appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Whitmore v. Ard, No. 6:12-cv-01049-JMC (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Whitmore v. Ard, 512 F. App'x 375 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

512 F. App'x 375 (Whitmore v. Ard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related