Whitmire v. Napier

4 Serg. & Rawle 290
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 18, 1818·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In Error.

Recitals of the title in a patent from the warrantee down to the patentee, are evidence against a defendant who relies on possession alone, and shews no title.

The probate of on'e of the witnesses to a deed, certified by a Judge, but not under his seal, is sufficient.

IN this case two points were determined, which The Court considered as settled.

1. In ejectment, the plaintiff having produced a patent with recitals of the title from the warrantee down to the patentee, and the defendant standing on his possession, but shewing no title, the recitals in the patent are evidence against him.

2.. A Judge took the probate of one of the witnesses to a deed, and certified the same, but not under his seal; the deed was held to be well proved.

Bellas, for the plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitmire v. Napier, 4 Serg. & Rawle 290 (Pa. 1818).

4 Serg. & Rawle 290 (Whitmire v. Napier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duncan v. Duncan
1 Watts 322 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1833)
Blythe v. Richards
10 Serg. & Rawle 261 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1823)