Whitman v. Ventetuolo
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Whitman v. Ventetuolo. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 F.3d 1037 →
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
June 7, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 93-1902
JAMES J. WHITMAN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
DONALD R. VENTETUOLO,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Ernest C. Torres, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
James J. Whitman on brief pro se.
________________
Michael B. Grant, Senior Legal Counsel, Rhode Island Department
_________________
of Corrections, on brief for appellee.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. James W. Whitman, a Rhode Island
___________
prisoner, filed a pro se complaint seeking declaratory relief
___ __
and damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Whitman claimed
that from 1979 to 1988 prison officials had repeatedly denied
him the opportunity to donate blood in exchange for sentence
reduction under a state statute then in effect. See R.I.
___
Gen. Laws 42-56-25 (repealed June 1988). The district
court, endorsing a magistrate-judge's report and
recommendation, dismissed the complaint for failure to state
a claim because, at its core, the complaint essentially
sought sentence reduction to which money damages were merely
subordinate, and, as such, presented only unexhausted habeas
claims. With the modification discussed below, we affirm for
substantially the reasons stated in the magistrate's June 15,
1993 report and recommendation, to which we add these
comments.
To begin, Whitman's complaint for relief does not
explicitly request a reduction of sentence; rather, he asks
to be granted an "accreditation," i.e., a recognition, that
____
but for defendant's conduct, he would otherwise have been
entitled to 320 days of good-time. In addition, Whitman
seeks $150 per day for each day he would have had deducted
from his sentence had defendant not deprived him "of the
opportunity to donate blood in exchange for a commensurate
sentence reduction."
-2-
Although Whitman does not go so far as to say that
he wants neither sentence reduction nor early release, he
insists that the relief sought is solely to redress his
deprivation of the due process rights recognized in Raso v.
____
Moran, 551 F. Supp. 294 (D.R.I. 1982),1 and that the
_____
district court mistakenly construed his complaint as a habeas
corpus action solely because Whitman had phrased part of the
relief sought as sentence related. Whitman contends that the
_______
designated 320-day good-time loss was simply to demonstrate
for purposes of calculating damages how much time he could
have earned if he had not been denied the opportunity to
donate blood.
To the extent that Whitman seeks to shorten the
duration of his confinement, the district court correctly
found that such relief is cognizable only in federal habeas
corpus, with its concomitant requirement of exhaustion of
____________________
1. Raso decided that the statute created two separate
____
constitutionally protected liberty interests. The first, and
the one about which Whitman complains, is that "inmates have
a legitimate expectation that they will be given the
opportunity to donate blood up to four times a year in return
for a ten-day sentence reduction absent disqualification for
health reasons." Id. at 299. The second, triggered once a
___
blood donation is made, entitles an inmate to a reduction in
sentence. Id. Raso also decided that the statute required
___ ____
prison officials to establish and administer a blood donation
program in which all qualified inmates could participate.
Id. at 298. To protect an inmate from wrongful deprivation
___
of the opportunity to give blood, Raso concluded that there
____
must be notice and a statement of reasons for any
disqualification as well as procedures by which inmates could
challenge the accuracy of that determination and submit
written evidence of their health status. Id. at 301.
__
-3-
state remedies, 28 U.S.C. 2254(b). Preiser v. Rodriguez,
_______ _________
411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). Whitman, however, also seeks
declaratory relief and an award of monetary damages to which
exhaustion would not apply. Id. at 494; see also Wolff v.
___ ___ ____ _____
McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 555 (1974). Nonetheless, even
_________
though Whitman's complaint does not seek release from
custody, the adjudication of his 1983 claims, at this
juncture, would invariably require a federal court to address
the question of the constitutionality of state procedures
utilized to determine eligibility for the blood donor
program. The "core" of Whitman's complaint is the alleged
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitman v. Ventetuolo, (1st Cir. 1994).
Whitman v. Ventetuolo (Whitman v. Ventetuolo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Preiser v. Rodriguez
411 U.S. 475 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Wolff v. McDonnell
418 U.S. 539 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Granberry v. Greer
481 U.S. 129 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Thomas A. Guerro v. Roger F. Mulhearn, Ralph F. Andrews v. Kathy Decote Young
498 F.2d 1249 (First Circuit, 1974)
Michael Thomas Harper v. Donald Jeffries, and Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
808 F.2d 281 (Third Circuit, 1986)
Ernest M. Serio v. Members of Louisiana State Board of Pardons, Howard Marsellus, Jr.
821 F.2d 1112 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Roy Heck v. James Humphrey, Dearborn County Prosecutor, Robert Ewbank, Attorney, and Michael Krinoph, Indiana State Police Investigator
997 F.2d 355 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
Raso v. Moran
551 F. Supp. 294 (D. Rhode Island, 1982)
Dewyer v. Davis
842 F. Supp. 1304 (W.D. Washington, 1993)
Offet v. Solem
823 F.2d 1256 (Eighth Circuit, 1987)
Bressman v. Farrier
900 F.2d 1305 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
Young v. Kenny
907 F.2d 874 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)