Whitman v. Tyler
8 Mass. 284
Opinion
pronounced their opinion that the extent upon Brooks’s execution was sufficient' to enable him to hold the land set off to him thereon; and that the extent on Bridge’s execution, and on Ellis’s execution, were insufficient and void. — The demandant accordingly, having shown a good and sufficient title to the demanded premises, except that part on which Brooks’s execution was levied and extended, had judgment for his possession of the same, and for h's costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitman v. Tyler, 8 Mass. 284 (Mass. 1811).
8 Mass. 284 (Whitman v. Tyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Welch v. Ossipee v. T. C. S. Bank
58 N.H. 147 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1877)
Hill v. Baker
32 Iowa 302 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1871)
Cavender v. Heirs of Smith
1 Iowa 306 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1855)
Fitch v. Tyler
34 Me. 463 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1852)
Whittier v. Varney
10 N.H. 291 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1839)
Bugnon v. Howes
13 Me. 154 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1836)
Litchfield v. Cudworth
32 Mass. 23 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1833)
Sturdivant v. Frothingham
10 Me. 100 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1833)
Blanchard v. Brooks
29 Mass. 47 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1832)
Howard v. Turner
6 Me. 106 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1829)
United States v. Slade
27 F. Cas. 1125 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1820)
Eddy v. Knap
2 Mass. 154 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1806)