Whitman v. Taubel
168 F. 1023, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5434
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 27, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The motion to remand is denied, upon the authority of Stimson v. United Wrapping Machine Co. (C. C.) 156 Fed. 298, and Bolles v. Lehigh Valley R. Co. (C. C.) 127 Fed. 884. An order may be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitman v. Taubel, 168 F. 1023, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5434 (circtsdny 1909).
168 F. 1023 (Whitman v. Taubel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ferguson v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
169 F. 888 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1909)