Whitman v. Taubel

168 F. 1023, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5434
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 F. 1023 (Whitman v. Taubel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitman v. Taubel, 168 F. 1023, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5434 (circtsdny 1909).

Opinion

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

The motion to remand is denied, upon the authority of Stimson v. United Wrapping Machine Co. (C. C.) 156 Fed. 298, and Bolles v. Lehigh Valley R. Co. (C. C.) 127 Fed. 884. An order may be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferguson v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
169 F. 888 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 F. 1023, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitman-v-taubel-circtsdny-1909.