Whitlock v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Whitlock v. State

317 S.E.2d 315, 170 Ga. App. 321, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1885

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 15, 1984

Docket68190; 68191

StatusPublished

This text of 317 S.E.2d 315 (Whitlock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitlock v. State, 317 S.E.2d 315, 170 Ga. App. 321, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1885 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

On appeal from the defendants’ convictions of escape, motor vehicle theft, criminal damage to property in the second degree, and criminal interference with government property, their appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and supporting brief pursuant to Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976). After considering the points raised in the brief and conducting a thorough examination of the record and transcript to determine independently whether there was any ground for reversal, this court previously determined that there was no arguable merit to the appeal and granted the motion to withdraw. Based on our determination that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find the defendants guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt, we now affirm the convictions. See generally Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89 (1) (263 SE2d 131) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Pope, J., concur. John R. Parks, District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

On appeal from the defendants’ convictions of escape, motor vehicle theft, criminal damage to property in the second degree, and criminal interference with government property, their appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and supporting brief pursuant to Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976). After considering the points raised in the brief and conducting a thorough examination of the record and transcript to determine independently whether there was any ground for reversal, this court previously determined that there was no arguable merit to the appeal and granted the motion to withdraw. Based on our determination that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find the defendants guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt, we now affirm the convictions. See generally Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89 (1) (263 SE2d 131) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Pope, J., concur. John R. Parks, District Attorney, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

317 S.E.2d 315, 170 Ga. App. 321, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitlock-v-state-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack