Whitlock v. State ex rel. School District

47 N.W. 284, 30 Neb. 815, 1890 Neb. LEXIS 175
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 47 N.W. 284 (Whitlock v. State ex rel. School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitlock v. State ex rel. School District, 47 N.W. 284, 30 Neb. 815, 1890 Neb. LEXIS 175 (Neb. 1890).

Opinion

Maxwell, J.

This action was brought in the district court of Douglas county to compel the plaintiff in error to issue a permit for a one-story brick building to cost about $5,000, to be erected on “ Capitol Square,” in the city of Omaha. The court below rendered judgment in favor of the relator, and the cause was brought into this court by a petition in error.

The petition of the board of education, which is very long, sets out the ordinances of the city of Omaha relating-to the erection of new buildings, to show that it was the duty of the plaintiff in error to grant such permit.

In his answer the plaintiff in error alleges “that he is advised and believes that the effect of the said acts passed by the said legislatures of the state of Nebraska, and of the conveyance made in pursuance thereof, is, and has been from the date of the passage of the first of said acts hereinbefore referred to, approved February 4, 1869, and the occupancy of said premises, and control thereof by the [817]*817board of regents, created by said act, on behalf of the city of Omaha, to vest the legal title of said premises and the control and use of said premises in the city of Omaha, and to vest in said city the sole and exclusive jurisdiction and control thereof, and that the said board of education, representing the school district of Omaha, have heretofore, and do at the present time occupy said premises only by the permission of said city, and that they have no legal right whatever to occupy, use, or control said premises, save by the consent and permission of said city of Omaha, and that the said school district of Omaha, the relator, has no legal or equitable title to said premises, and that the relator is not in any sense the owner thereof, and is not entitled under and by virtue of the provisions of the ordinances of said city relating to the inspection of buildings, hereinbefore referred to, to the building permit applied for. That prior to the application of the relator to this respondent for said permit, the city council of the city of Omaha adopted a concurrent resolution, which resolution was approved on the 6th day of September, 1890, by the mayor of said city directing the superintendent of buildings (this respondent) and all other persons, not to issue or cause to be issued to any person or corporation a permit to erect any building upon the grounds hereinbefore described, without the express permission of the mayor and council of said city in writing; which said resolution is in words and figures following, to-wit:

“ ‘ Resolved, By the city council of the city of Omaha, the mayor concurring, that the superintendent of buildings and all other persons be and they hereby are instructed and directed not to issue or cause to be issued to any person, persons, company, association, or corporation, a permit to erect any building upon the grounds commonly known as the “High School Grounds,” in the city of Omaha, without the express permission, of the mayor and council of said city in writing, and said superintendent of buildings and all [818]*818officers of said city are directed and instructed to see that all violations of chapter XVII of the Revised Ordinances or amendments thereto, for said city, compiled by W. J. Connell, are prevented, if possible, and all violators thereof prosecuted and punished/

“ And respondent says that in obedience to the said resolution and in pursuance of the direction and authority of the council in that regard, he has declined and refused to issue any permit for the erection of any building whatever upon said premises, and shall continue so to decline and refuse and to obey said resolution, according to its tenor and effect, unless otherwise ordered by said city council or by the court; that in the year 1869, and before the passage, of the act establishing thc.school district of Omaha, and \yhile the premises in question were in the charge and control of the board of regents provided for in the act granting said premises to the city of Omaha, the books, papers, archives, records, and other public property belonging to the state of Nebraska, were removed from said premises, and the ‘ old capitol building ’ situated thereon, to the place designated by law as the capital of the state, to-wit, Lincoln, Lancaster county, Nebraska, whereby a full and complete and perfect title in fee became vested in the city of Omaha, to be held and enjoyed only subject to the conditions and limitations in said act set forth; and respondent further says that at the date of the passage and approval of the'act creating the city of Omaha a school district and providing for the government of said district by a board of education, to-wit, Eebruaiy 6, 1873, and of an act relative to public schools in metropolitan cities which took effect March 31, 1887, the premises hereinbefore described as ‘ High School Square ’ and the buildings and erections thereon were not owned by any school district within the corporate limits of the city of Omaha. > The act of 1869, transferring the title of capitol square to the city of Omaha, is as follows:

[819]*819“ ' AN ACT to transfer to the city of Omaha for school purposes the capitol grounds and buildings in said city, and to provide a board of regents for the management of the same.

“'Whereas, The capitol grounds heretofore occupied by the state of Nebraska were originally conveyed to the territory of Nebraska by said city of Omaha; and,

“'Whereas, After the erection of a capitol building thereon had been commenced by the government of the United States, the appropriation therefor was found to be insufficient; and,

“‘Whereas, After the suspension of the construction of said building for the reason aforesaid, the people of said city of Omaha contributed the sum of sixty thousand dollars to complete the same; and,

“'Whereas, The state of Nebraska has ceased to use .said capitol grounds and buildings for the object originally contemplated; and,

“ ‘ Whereas, The said capitol building is now in a condition to require the expenditure of a large sum before the said building can be safely used by the state of Nebraska for any purpose:

“' Section 1. Therefore, Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Nebraska: That whenever the books, papers, archives, records, and other public property belonging to the state shall be removed from the old capitol building in the city of Omaha, to the place designated by law as the capital of this state, the said capitol building and grounds surrounding the same and whereon the same stands, known and designated on the lithographed plat of said city as Capitol square, shall revert to and vest in said city of Omaha for school purposes; and the governor of this state is hereby authorized and required, for and on behalf of this state, to make and execute, under his official seal, the full and complete conveyance of said property to said city for the purpose herein mentioned, on or before the first [820]*820day of April, A.D. 1869; Provided, That the said property shall be used by said city for the purpose of a high school, college, or other institution of learning, and for no other pui’pose whatever; And provided further, That said city shall never alien, convey, lease, or in any manner incumber the same.

Sec. 2. That Alvin Saunders, G. W. Frost, Thomas Davis, J. H. Kellom, Augustus Kountz, and J. M.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Education v. Dick
78 P. 812 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 N.W. 284, 30 Neb. 815, 1890 Neb. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitlock-v-state-ex-rel-school-district-neb-1890.