Whitlock v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Whitlock v. State

127 So. 927, 23 Ala. App. 687

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 18, 1930

Docket8 Div. 22.

StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 927 (Whitlock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitlock v. State, 127 So. 927, 23 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKBN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction pronounced and entered against this appellant ; said judgment being based upon his conviction by the jury of the offenses charged against him in the indictment containing two counts. The first count charged him with distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous or malt liquors, etc. And the second charged him with the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose. The judgment was suspended pending appeal to this court, and we note that the amount of the appeal bond was fixed by the court at $2,500.

The appeal here is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions, thus rendering the regularity of the record the only question for consideration by us.

An examination of this record discloses no irregularity or error, and, being regular in all things, the judgment of conviction from which the appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKBN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction pronounced and entered against this appellant ; said judgment being based upon his conviction by the jury of the offenses charged against him in the indictment containing two counts. The first count charged him with distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous or malt liquors, etc. And the second charged him with the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose. The judgment was suspended pending appeal to this court, and we note that the amount of the appeal bond was fixed by the court at $2,500.

The appeal here is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions, thus rendering the regularity of the record the only question for consideration by us.

An examination of this record discloses no irregularity or error, and, being regular in all things, the judgment of conviction from which the appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 So. 927, 23 Ala. App. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitlock-v-state-alactapp-1930.