Whitlock v. Kirkpatrick

149 A.D.3d 1448, 50 N.Y.S.3d 896

This text of 149 A.D.3d 1448 (Whitlock v. Kirkpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitlock v. Kirkpatrick, 149 A.D.3d 1448, 50 N.Y.S.3d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Simmons v Kirkpatrick, 142 AD3d 1245, 1245 [2016]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Simmons v. Kirkpatrick
142 A.D.3d 1245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A.D.3d 1448, 50 N.Y.S.3d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitlock-v-kirkpatrick-nyappdiv-2017.