Whitlock v. Beecher

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 313
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedNovember 16, 1936
DocketFile No. 50193
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 313 (Whitlock v. Beecher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitlock v. Beecher, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 313 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Plaintiff asks for a disclosure of defense. The defendant claims his motion for a more specific statement not having been answered he should not be compelled to disclose. *Page 314

The two are independent of one another and no motion for a judgment of non-suit has been made for failure to answer the motion for a more specific statement.

The instant motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Conn. Super. Ct. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitlock-v-beecher-connsuperct-1936.