Whitlock v. Beecher

4 Conn. Supp. 313, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 199
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided November 16, 1936·No. File #50193·Published

Opinion

DICKENSON, J.

Plaintiff asks for a disclosure of defense. The defendant claims his motion for a more specific statement not having been answered he should not be compelled to disclose.

[314] The two are independent of one another and no motion for a judgment of nonsuit has been made for failure to answer the motion for a more specific statement.

The instant motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitlock v. Beecher, 4 Conn. Supp. 313, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 199 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

4 Conn. Supp. 313 (Whitlock v. Beecher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.