Whitlock v. Agoglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Whitlock v. Agoglia

134 A.D. 983, 119 N.Y.S. 1149

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1909·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the court erred in excluding evidence tending to show the nature and extent of the services rendered by the plaintiff. As the relation of attorney and client existed when the contract sued on was made, the burden was upon the plaintiff to show that the contract was fair and reasonable and freely entered into by the defendant with a full understanding of his rights. (See Matter of Holland, 110 App. Div. 799.) Woodward, Jenks, Burr, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the court erred in excluding evidence tending to show the nature and extent of the services rendered by the plaintiff. As the relation of attorney and client existed when the contract sued on was made, the burden was upon the plaintiff to show that the contract was fair and reasonable and freely entered into by the defendant with a full understanding of his rights. (See Matter of Holland, 110 App. Div. 799.) Woodward, Jenks, Burr, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Whitlock v. Agoglia, 134 A.D. 983, 119 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

134 A.D. 983 (Whitlock v. Agoglia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related