Whitley v. Wade

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Whitley v. Wade

111 S.E.2d 873, 251 N.C. 707, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 529

DecidedJanuary 14, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E.2d 873 (Whitley v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitley v. Wade, 111 S.E.2d 873, 251 N.C. 707, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 529 (N.C. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Peb Curiam.

This was a case for the twelve. The evidence was in sharp conflict — in fact, irreconcilably so. The jury accepted the plaintiff’s version of how the collision occurred. We have carefully examined all the defendant’s assignments of error and the exceptions on which they are based, and, in our opinion, they present no prejudicial error of sufficient magnitude to justify a new trial. Moreover, no new or novel question of law is involved in the appeal.

In the trial below there is in law

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peb Curiam.

This was a case for the twelve. The evidence was in sharp conflict — in fact, irreconcilably so. The jury accepted the plaintiff’s version of how the collision occurred. We have carefully examined all the defendant’s assignments of error and the exceptions on which they are based, and, in our opinion, they present no prejudicial error of sufficient magnitude to justify a new trial. Moreover, no new or novel question of law is involved in the appeal.

In the trial below there is in law

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 S.E.2d 873, 251 N.C. 707, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitley-v-wade-nc-1960.