Whitley v. United States
This text of 796 A.2d 26 (Whitley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
In consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, and the consent motion of the Public Defender Service to participate as amicus curiae, and the lodged brief of the Public Defender Service, and the opposition of the United States to appellant’s petition, it is hereby ORDERED by the en banc court as follows:
1. The consent motion of the Public Defender Service to participate as ami-cus curiae is granted, and the lodged brief is filed; and
2. the petition for rehearing en banc is denied, without prejudice to the filing of a new petition directed to the revised opinion of the division;
and it is FURTHER ORDERED by the division, sua sponte, as follows:
1. rehearing by the division is granted;
2. the opinion of the division issued on October 25, 2001 and reported in Whitley v. United States, 783 A.2d 629 (D.C.2001), is modified in that footnote 6 of that opinion is stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
796 A.2d 26, 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitley-v-united-states-dc-2002.