Whitley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Whitley v. State

476 S.W.3d 317, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1174, 2015 WL 7258851

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 2015·No. ED 102458·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

D’Andre Whitley appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[318] The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

D’Andre Whitley appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[318] The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Whitley v. State, 476 S.W.3d 317, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1174, 2015 WL 7258851 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

476 S.W.3d 317 (Whitley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.