Whitley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Whitley v. State

476 S.W.3d 317, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1174, 2015 WL 7258851

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 17, 2015

DocketED 102458

StatusPublished

This text of 476 S.W.3d 317 (Whitley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitley v. State, 476 S.W.3d 317, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1174, 2015 WL 7258851 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

D’Andre Whitley appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[318]*318The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

D’Andre Whitley appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[318]*318The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 S.W.3d 317, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1174, 2015 WL 7258851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitley-v-state-moctapp-2015.