Whitley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Whitley v. State

775 S.W.2d 221, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 890, 1989 WL 65904

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 1989·No. No. 55853·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Whitley v. State, 775 S.W.2d 221, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 890, 1989 WL 65904 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

775 S.W.2d 221 (Whitley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.