Whitley v. State

68 S.E. 863, 8 Ga. App. 165, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 80
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 6, 1910
Docket1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 S.E. 863 (Whitley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitley v. State, 68 S.E. 863, 8 Ga. App. 165, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 80 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. Under the instructions of the Supreme Court in response to the certified questions (134 Ga. 758), there was no error in overruling the defendant’s demurrer or in striking his special plea in abatement.

2. Though some of the testimony admitted was irrelevant, it does not appear that the irrelevant circumstances were prejudicial or eohld have affected the result. The relevant evidence authorized the conviction of the defendant.

3. The charge of the court fairly presented the issues submitted in the case; and if more specific instructions had been desired, they should have been properly requested.

4. There was no error in refusing to sanction the petition'for "certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
84 S.E. 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 863, 8 Ga. App. 165, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitley-v-state-gactapp-1910.